Delivery of actions will not rest with our group alone; a shared responsibility and resourcing model reflects the collective impact approach at the heart of the CAP, where success depends on many hands working together.
We acknowledge that strategy development must be grounded in meaningful partnership with mana whenua; this is an initial plan that will adapt to changing pressures with ongoing mana whenua direction and guidance.
An Upper Lakes CAP Governance Group, comprising core members (including mana whenua) and a wider circle of collaborators, will operate under clear terms of reference.
Delivery will be led by conservation and catchment groups, mana whenua, agencies (including ORC), landholders, and industry, supported by ORC programmes and CAP coordination; resourcing will draw on contestable funds, agency budgets, other funding, and the significant value of volunteer and in-kind contributions.
Objective: Develop a long-term, sustainable, and diverse funding framework to deliver CAP strategies and support proactive, community-led restoration.
Impact: Supporting impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Identify and bridge knowledge gaps, and provide accessible science to enable evidence-based management and support CAP strategies.
Impact: Supporting impact
Feasibility: High feasibility
Objective: Continue to build partnerships between mana whenua, government, and conservation groups to uphold Kāi Tahu values and shared aspirations.
Impact: Supporting impact
Feasibility: Very high feasibility
Objective: Strengthen understanding of mahika kai, improve conditions at sites, and increase species abundance.
Impact: Supporting impact
Feasibility: Midium feasibility
Objective: Reduce predator mammal populations to increase native wildlife, enhance mahika kai, and protect uncommon ecosystems.
Impact: High impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Support tuna (eel) and kanakana (lamprey) migration to enhance wildlife, mahika kai, freshwater ecosystems, and ki uta ki tai.
Impact: High impact
Feasibility: High feasibility
Objective: Reduce interactions between introduced fish and galaxiids to boost native wildlife and freshwater ecosystem health.
Impact: Very high impact
Feasibility: Very high feasibility
Objective: Reduce wilding conifers and terrestrial weeds to improve vegetation, expand natives, and protect ecosystems.
Impact: Very high impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Protect existing native vegetation, expand planting, and reduce browsing by introduced herbivores.
Impact: Medium impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Protect and restore wetlands to increase extent, function, biodiversity, and downstream water quality.
Impact: Very high impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Reduce stormwater and wastewater contaminants to improve water quality, freshwater ecosystems, and mahika kai.
Impact: Medium impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Reduce sediments, nutrients, pathogens, and agrichemicals from land use entering freshwater
Impact: High impact
Feasibility: Medium feasibility
Objective: Reduce risk of new invasives and contain/remove lagarosiphon to protect ecosystems and mahika kai.
Impact: High impact
Feasibility: Very high feasibility
Finally, we turned our ideas into action. We identified the points where interventions could make the biggest difference, and grouped these into strategies and programmes.
These strategies are now shaping an operational work plan, along with monitoring and funding pathways, to turn our vision into reality.